Miller Test is a Old Fart!
When looking at the Miller test that the supreme court still uses in obscenity cases to this day, to still be using this system is like to still be chopping someones hand off for stealing. In this day and age where everyone has there own opinions and mini sub-cultures to be apart of the views that one person carry are most likely then not different from the person next them. Why should a hand picked jury that was formed in the eye of the prosecutor to ensure a win decide what is obscene and what is not obscene in our country? Even if it is a fairly picked jury for the most part not to many people in our culture are going to stand up in a room and proclaim that fisting is not obscene and that is legal entertainment. There is still a dark shadow looking over the "Porn" topic that people think they will be ridiculed and looked down on in society so they follow the format.
If a material is obscene to one adult then that adult can choose to not watch it, if this material is available for children to view easily then it should be prosecuted. We talked about how children do and do not have rights in lectures this week and I believe deep down they only have basic human rights but freedom of choice rights for the most part. This is so because parents are part of the guiding process as they have been since man was created. So to protect these children from pornographic material in my book is fine, but to censor porn because one adult finds it repulsive to their standards to me is absurd and unconstitutional.
